Null


HomeBlown57

  • Karma: +0/-0
Forced E85
« on: May 24, 2011, 08:44:17 AM »
I have built a 454:
Bowtie aluminum heads
7.8-1
.640 cam
115 lobe centers
The plan is E85 on EFI with Twin Turbos. I was thinking gasoline at 20PSI. Now that I have made the E85 jump, I am wondering where the boost limit is.

Generally I ask for facts not opinions, but this time let's dream a little. I know nobody here has done it so let's hear about what you have read, or heard.

I am thinking that the turbos that I have can provide a over 30PSI. I think the fuel can take it. The bottom end is pretty hard core. What kind of power do you think this setup will provide.

  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

TJS Nordic

  • Karma: +2/-0
Re: Forced E85
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2011, 09:38:03 AM »
Find Unchained on pb.com and theturboforums.com
he has done it and knows his shit.

Dirty Air

  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Forced E85
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2011, 10:09:53 AM »
Here"s my 2 cents and you probably wont like it! :banghead:.......maximum effective comp. ratio for pump gas (92octain) is 12.4:1 and E-85 (105octain) is 14.5:1

Your set up at sea level: based on a static comp. ratio of 7.8:1
10lbs boost......13.1:1
20lbs boost......18.4:1
30lbs boost......23.7:1

Go straight to full methanol and go for 35lbs. >:D
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
You know me, my 12"incher is upside down!

HomeBlown57

  • Karma: +0/-0
Forced E85
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2011, 02:09:41 PM »
Dirty Air, are these figures based on 100% VE?
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

IRRebel

  • Karma: +16/-0
Re: Forced E85
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2011, 04:32:36 PM »
Dirty Air, are these figures based on 100% VE?

I think they're bogus numbers, myself. I set out to do the same thing! Point of fact, I have an assembled short block that is coming back apart because all the local stations here dropped the E85 fuel.  :screwy: Had a fuel tank to be installed in my truck and everything for the lake!

So, back to square, well, not quite one, but pistons have to be changed, cylinders matched, and rebalance the whole friggin thing to run on AVgas........ :banghead:

And NOW I threw a 10-71 at it............ :sly:

BUT, Proppy and I explored this pretty extensively about a year ago which is when I pulled the trigger on an 10.5:1 initial compression engine to run around 15 or so PSI boost (assuming a 20% overdriven 6-71). I think the final compression came out about 22:1 or so. Very mild,perfectly fine with E-85, ethanol or methanol in a blown application. I was urged to go to 12-13:1, and toss even more boost at it, where I started looking for a GOOD 10-12-71. I have another 10-71, but nothing like this Mooneyham I just got, and I could never replicate it for what I paid for it.

Alas, and I have to say, he has the right to say "I told you so", Nordie warned me against this endeavor. Just not gonna happen or practical in any way shape or form unless you're willing to go to the ends of the earth to be the fastest out there.

Just random thinking out loud.........And I think, Superchargers are WAYYYYYY different than turbochargers are on the stuff.  Turbochargers have no real way to take direct advantage of the cooling/evaporation  effects of the fuel. They will to an extent, but not nearly the way a blower engine benefits, and thus, final C/R needs to be taken cautiously using E85 and Blower numbers on a turbo application. 

Ray
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways totally worn out shouting 'Holy Shit what a ride!"---Crewcheif22 AKA Keith

obnoxious001

  • Karma: +4/-1
Re: Forced E85
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2011, 05:35:01 PM »
I have built a 454:
Bowtie aluminum heads
7.8-1
.640 cam
115 lobe centers
The plan is E85 on EFI with Twin Turbos. I was thinking gasoline at 20PSI. Now that I have made the E85 jump, I am wondering where the boost limit is.

Generally I ask for facts not opinions, but this time let's dream a little. I know nobody here has done it so let's hear about what you have read, or heard.

I am thinking that the turbos that I have can provide a over 30PSI. I think the fuel can take it. The bottom end is pretty hard core. What kind of power do you think this setup will provide.

Check with Stevo143 on PB or RDP.  He is currently running a 496 on E85 that I rebuilt for him, and we are getting close to completing the long block for his other boat,, 621 cubic inch all aluminum engine that will also run turbos on E85. 

You don't say what your intended usage is, or how long you plan to run at full boost, but I think your 20 lbs of boost on gasoline was kind of high, depending on your usage, even assuming racing gas.  My turbo background dates back to the late 70's at Gale Banks.  I don't think you want to run it right "on the edge" unless you have a ton of money and enjoy rebuilding your stuff.
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

Dirty Air

  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Forced E85
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2011, 07:20:00 PM »
Dirty Air, are these figures based on 100% VE?

Ron,
 I'm not sure if that is based on a 100% volumetric efficiency or not. I used BDS's formula but i'm assuming that it is and If its not then that's a built in fail safe  ;) Either way with the octane levels of fuel (92 P.G. or 105 E85) that we have been talking about it's going to detonate at these boost levels, sure you can take a bunch of timing out, intercooler, things like that and push the limits of these numbers a bit but at what cost? The only thing that safely will allow these boost numbers is higher octane. like VP C-14 116 octane $12 gal. :screwy:  or methanol 135 to 140 octane(by the way is only about $5 a gal. in drum purchase)  but you use twice as much so its about the same price.   
Ray,
 Boost is boost no matter how you make it, whether its a blower or a turbo or a compressor with a air hose. It still does the same thing, Increases cylinder pressure, witch will detonate the fuel at some point if the octane or flash point is not high enough. Sure turbo's and blowers make it differently. blowers make it right now, off idle and slow and linear whereas turbos come on later and BANG!....a shit load all at once.
If E85 could handle  total compression ratio of 22:1 without detonating I think guys with 15:1 drag motors would not be spending $12 to $15 a gal. for race fuel. 
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
You know me, my 12"incher is upside down!

propless

  • Karma: +12/-0
Re: Forced E85
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2011, 01:00:09 AM »

Just random thinking out loud.........And I think, Superchargers are WAYYYYYY different than turbochargers are on the stuff.  Turbochargers have no real way to take direct advantage of the cooling/evaporation  effects of the fuel. They will to an extent, but not nearly the way a blower engine benefits, and thus, final C/R needs to be taken cautiously using E85 and Blower numbers on a turbo application. 

Ray

 Dont forget one thing Ray,  Hes talking about EFI on this thing, so its going to inject that nice cooling fuel into it after the turbos.

Find Unchained on pb.com and theturboforums.com
he has done it and knows his shit.

 X 100,  Mark (Unchained) is the one you need to talk to !!!

 Marks motor,  540 ci, twin turbo,  EFI,  E85,  29.5 lbs boost = 1841 torque @ 4800 rpm and 1810 HP @ 5800

http://www.performanceboats.com/dyno/52723-540-arias-twin-turbo-efi-dyno-video-2.html#post911003

 Heres something I copied and saved when Ray and I where considering E85 blower motors, some interesting facts here.


Ethanol vs Methanol

Methanol and Ethanol both have advantages and disadvantages over fossil fuel gasoline. For instance, both alcohols can run at a much higher compression ratio without octane-boosting additives

Alcohols burn more completely because their molecules contain oxygen;
Oxygenated chemical compounds contain oxygen as a part of their chemical structure. The term usually refers to oxygenated fuels. Oxygenates are usually employed as gasoline additives to reduce carbon monoxide that is created during the burning of the fuel….. Carbon Monoxide is BAD!

The oxygenate MTBE has been found to have contaminated groundwater, mostly through leaks in underground gasoline storage tanks. In 2004, California and New York banned MTBE, generally replacing it with ethanol.(Ethanol is Biodegradible…..wont harm the environment!)

Alcohol fuels such as methanol and ethanol, are partially oxidized fuels and need to be run at much richer mixtures than gasoline. As a consequence, the total volume of fuel burned per cycle counterbalances the lower energy per unit volume, and the net energy released per cycle is higher.

carbon monoxide emissions are 100% lower than fossil-fueled engines because the only products of an alcohol combustion reaction are carbon dioxide (plants breath this), water (plants need this) , and heat .

Methanol is the lightest and simplest alcohol, produced from the natural gas component methane. Its application is limited due to its toxicity…..IT WILL KILL YOU!
PURE Ethanol, also known as grain alcohol or ethyl alcohol, is most commonly used in alcoholic beverages. However, it may also be used as a fuel….YOU CAN DRINK IT!..but dont because it is denatured so you CANT!

Methanol’s octane rating is 129 (RON), 103 (MON), which equates to 113 (AKI)
Ethanol's octane rating is 129 (RON), 102 (MON), which equates to 116 (AKI).
Gasoline is approximately 91 (RON), 81 (MON), equal to 86 (AKI)
AKI is 'Anti-Knock Index'
contrary to popular belief.....It should be noted that octane rating does not relate to the energy content of the fuel or heating value, nor the speed at which the flame initiated by the spark plug propagates across the cylinder. It is only a measure of the fuel's resistance to autoignition.

Ethanol is harder to ignite than Methanol.
Ethanol is less likely to have detonation than Methanol.


Ethanol has 27% less energy per Gallon than Gas.
Methanol has 55% less energy per Gallon than Gas.

This is why more volume is required for each of the Alcohol fuels and why Methanol take almost twice as much fuel as Ethanol over gasoline.

If gasoline is run at its preferred maximum power air/fuel mixture of 12.5:1 air/fuel ratio, it will release approximately 20 MJ (about 19,000 BTU) of energy, where ethanol run at its preferred maximum power mixture of 6.5:1 air/fuel ratio will liberate approximately 25.7 MJ (24,400 BTU), and methanol at a 4.5:1 air/fuel ratio liberates about 29.1 MJ (27,650 BTU).
Methanol makes the most power (29.1 MJ), but also takes more fuel than Ethanol to make that power…..
Apples to Apples….. Ethanol will out perform Methanol.
Methanol gets its power from the volume consumed.
Combustion:
Methanol combustion is: 2CH3OH + 3O2 → 2CO2 + 4H2O + heat
Ethanol combustion is: C2H5OH + 3O2 → 2CO2 + 3H2O + heat
CO2 = carbon dioxide (plants breath this)
H2O = water (plants need this) ,
heat = heat.

As you can see above, Methanol produces more water during combustion than ethanol. Methanol = 4H2O to Ethanol = 3H2O….
Hydrogen (H) may reduce knock by contributing its high thermal conductivity
Methanol has 4 hydrogens, Ethanol has 6 hydrogens,
= Ethanol absorbs more heat and therefor is more energy efficient, effeciency in the right conditions is power without the knock.
Given the higher octane rating of Ethanol, Modified engines are capable of generating equivalent or higher horsepower and torque burning Ethanol than conventional gasoline despite the lower energy density of Ethanol.

Alcohols higher octane allows an increase of an engine's compression ratio for increased thermal efficiency. In one study, complex engine controls and increased exhaust gas recirculation allowed a compression ratio of 19.5 with Ethanol to E50…..

With Ethanol thermal efficiency, up to approximately that for a diesel, was achieved.
This would result in the MPG (miles per gallon) of a dedicated ethanol vehicle to be about the same as one burning gasoline…..your not getting that with Methanol because of the volume needed to produce the power!

Hope this helps set some things clear……
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
Welcome to the club of broken boats :o  Pay here$ bend over and move along.

lbhsbz

  • Karma: +29/-1
Forced E85
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2011, 07:46:49 AM »
Here"s my 2 cents and you probably wont like it! :banghead:.......maximum effective comp. ratio for pump gas (92octain) is 12.4:1 and E-85 (105octain) is 14.5:1

Your set up at sea level: based on a static comp. ratio of 7.8:1
10lbs boost......13.1:1
20lbs boost......18.4:1
30lbs boost......23.7:1

Go straight to full methanol and go for 35lbs. >:D

Oh....BS.  Everyone knows more boost is better. :-)
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

HomeBlown57

  • Karma: +0/-0
Forced E85
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2011, 08:38:14 AM »
Oh....BS.  Everyone knows more boost is better. :-)

I was never very good at reading those charts. A piston is much easier to read. This one said pump gas plus 15psi plus 10-1 plus cast pistons equals loose ring lands. I kept the lands if anyone knows a good welder!
This one said you can't afford to make the same mistake again!
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

Dirty Air

  • Karma: +1/-0
Re: Forced E85
« Reply #10 on: May 25, 2011, 07:09:05 PM »
Oh....BS.  Everyone knows more boost is better. :-)

Pat, I could not agree with you more .....Mo boost is Mo betta! O0  I just don't want to to see Ron's shiny new slugs (exhibit B) :thumbup: end up looking like (exhibit A) :thumbdown:
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
You know me, my 12"incher is upside down!

HomeBlown57

  • Karma: +0/-0
Forced E85
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2011, 07:49:13 AM »
So,        If we are using those calculators......
467 inches at 7000 rpm 100% VE is about 950cfm. Approximately 150cfm  properly combusted equals 100hp.
If I boost it 15psi (roughly double atmosphere) calling it 200% VE that is 1900cfm that would result in 1266 HP
My goal is 1000HP that leaves 17% on the table to cover VE shortcomings and rotational losses. Not too bad. VE losses can be compensated with adding boost.
I hate bench racers but I have been working quite a bit lately so the project has gone a bit stale.

Does this seem to be correct?
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

 


Null

SMFPacks CMS 1.0.3 © 2026