It seems like the Engineers, Designer, R and D departmets of said manufacture of pump would have to have such a device to collect data or improve on a product. Or at lest something similar to what you guys are thinking of shouldn't they? Not that thay would ever tell you how to make one.
I called 10 places around the US and even called the US office of Hamilton. They all said they don't have a pump dyno. American Turbine has an
impeller dyno. So they can tell you how much shaft power an impeller absorbs - which is very important of course... but it is not the same as inside a bowl and with water getting sucked, rammed and who knows what else up the intake, through the impeller across the wear ring over the stator vanes down the throat and blah blah.
Now I may have been getting sandbagged by some of them that I called but I tend to think not. A real pump dyno that could properly deal with the flow rates of a pump and then recondition the water and get the air out of it and back into the inlet at simulated hull speeds of 100mph would be big, expensive and very tedious to operate. And we would have heard about it. There are of course some very large and fast water tunnels in the US. But these are usually academic/government operated and not rigged to do jetboat pumps all day long.
Jack at MPD told me what he was told of the story of how the Berk company developed their pump and they most certainly did NOT have much in the way of test equipment. They were doing what we do now - use the assmometer.
So the most fascinating thing for me about all this is that it would appear that nobody really knows whether a jetboat pump is 50% efficient, 75% efficient or 99% efficient (at converting engine shaft hp into thrust hp).
PS - I've got $1 that says they are not 99% efficient!