Null


Katchina79

  • Karma: +0/-0
Edelbrooke carb
« on: May 17, 2011, 12:54:15 PM »
 I found a brand new 600cfm edelbroke carb for my boat I have a 455 olds stock with a mild cam do thinku think this would work...all I have ever owned is holly carbs?? O0
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

Marcsrollin

  • Karma: +33/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #1 on: May 17, 2011, 12:59:53 PM »
600 cfm is too small!
  • Boat #1: 1978 TX-19 Youngblood
  • Boat #2: 1994 24 foot Sundancer Pontoon
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
Taco'd "a person or people that show up with one lake lice and a family of 50 and cram 3 people at a time on it with no disregard to boating rules or ethics. Usualy crap in toilets and throw shit paper in trash cans. Hang out at the boat ramp like its a swimming hole. Have zero insurance on anything they own and dont give two shits less about your property."

Katchina79

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #2 on: May 17, 2011, 09:03:45 PM »
Well I looked up on the internet and a stock 455olds which is what mine is requires a 500cfm to a 650cfm so I thought it would be ok, ....but is there any problom with useing a edelbroke carb?? O0
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

Brendella Pickle

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #3 on: May 18, 2011, 06:24:19 AM »
If it's free and ready to run... I'd run it.
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

IRRebel

  • Karma: +16/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #4 on: May 18, 2011, 07:56:31 AM »
Well I looked up on the internet and a stock 455olds which is what mine is requires a 500cfm to a 650cfm so I thought it would be ok, ....but is there any problom with useing a edelbroke carb?? O0
Not really, but where's the other one?  :screwy:

Edelbrocks are, for lack of a better description, old Carter AFB and AFS designs. VERY different than the Holley in how it's tuned and worked with. Used to prefer them over the Holleys on street cars back in the day, because they can be tuned quite handily and even in a parking space at a "street meet".... :thumbup:.....They came quite often stock on dual quad offerings from GM, Ford and Chrysler back in the 60's.

You're problem is you're internet "requirement" is probably assuming daily street use from idle, many partial throttle situations and very RARE full throttle use. On a jet boat, complete opposite. You're going to be running the boat, idling out of the NWZ, cruising, at 3000-3500 rpm, and (hopefully) 5000 rpm at WOT far more often. There really only needs to be four throttle positions, idle, 1/2, 3/4 and WOT on these things........ :sly:.........but seen them work very well on jet boats!  :thumbup:

The carb brand isn't the issue, it's the CFM. At 600, unless theres a second one on a dual quad or tunnel ram, blower, etc, you're leaving a LOT on the table at WOT, IMHO.

Then again, as BP said, "If it's free I'd run it!". At least for now and look for something a lot bigger, like an 800, 850 or a second 600 and dual quad intake.... :beer:

Ray
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways totally worn out shouting 'Holy Shit what a ride!"---Crewcheif22 AKA Keith

Katchina79

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #5 on: May 18, 2011, 08:11:04 AM »
Thanks guys...the carb is 250$....but I was planning on next season getting another 600 and running  a tunnel ram O0 and the carb that is on it is a rochester quadro.jet...it is trashed bad!! Do u think go for it for the season?
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party


IRRebel

  • Karma: +16/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #7 on: May 18, 2011, 08:53:02 AM »
Thanks guys...the carb is 250$....but I was planning on next season getting another 600 and running  a tunnel ram O0 and the carb that is on it is a rochester quadro.jet...it is trashed bad!! Do u think go for it for the season?

Q-Jet is a good carb, really, don't think you're gonna improve anything with the Edelbrock. But what comes to top of mind is your intake manifold........is it set up for a square bore carb or spread bore?  ::)  THAT could be another expense........forget adaptors, don't work well......

Ray
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
"Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways totally worn out shouting 'Holy Shit what a ride!"---Crewcheif22 AKA Keith

Katchina79

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #8 on: May 18, 2011, 09:28:12 AM »
I think it is set up for square bore,it is same price for a rebuilt q-jet as for a brand new edelbroke carb O0
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

Brendella Pickle

  • Karma: +0/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #9 on: May 18, 2011, 09:39:15 AM »
Did you look at the ebay link? Under $100 and you're on the water.
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party

propless

  • Karma: +12/-0
Re: Edelbrooke carb
« Reply #10 on: May 18, 2011, 10:06:24 AM »
I think it is set up for square bore,it is same price for a rebuilt q-jet as for a brand new edelbroke carb O0

 Q-jets are spread bore (small primary side and huge secondary side).   I always had good luck with Q-jets after a bit of tinkering.  And dont believe these are small carbs, there where versions capable of 750+ cfm.   But they are the worlds ugliest carb if that matters. 


 
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/EDELBROCK-1407-3050-UNIVERSAL-750-CFM-CARBURATOR-CAR-_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem4aab423e64QQitemZ320700825188QQptZMotorcyclesQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories

Under $100. Done.
Looks like a good deal to me. 

 
  • Like
    Dislike
    Love
    HaHa
    Angry
    Surprise
    Sad
    Party
Welcome to the club of broken boats :o  Pay here$ bend over and move along.

 


Null

SMFPacks CMS 1.0.3 © 2026