I would think that removing the step would allow the exhaust pulse to stay constant all the way out and help with pulling in more fuel?
Just thinking about this from a physics standpoint, the pulses would remain the same whether the outlet was large or small, I would think the step could actually enhance the scavenging effect by allowing two different pulse intensities. Unless force inducted, which makes the exhaust pulses linear and mono directional.
Hard to say for sure, but would love to see the hard numbers on it.
What we used to see with just hose connecting the tips to the risers is the hose would throb, basically deadening the signal and we always believed this killed flow (read; reduced scavenging).
I did a tournament boat a while back and pulled the 2' chunks of wire reinforced hose off and used copper pipe to the mufflers from the elbows and the owner said it picked up almost 100 rpm, this is a extreme example, but it proved the theory that something was being taken away.
A large volume of cooling water in the exhaust would amplify this effect.
Something we did on the Jet Skis years ago was to install a pressure relief on the cooling to the wet exhaust and cut the water in half. The difference was immediately noticed, but also noticed the sound increase.
Water doesn't compress, so it's taking up space within the pipe, less water, more exhaust flow. The pulse signal can really help or hurt depending on what the application is. I used to build "H" pipes for wet exhaust for this exact purpose, the biggest differences were noted on the most stock applications. Never got a chance to wrap my head around why.
GT
Sent from my SM-G900V using
SoCal Jet Boats mobile app