Null

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Chad89GT

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
51
http://www.sterndrives.com/merc/sternspecs.html

This is real current so they don't show a 4 barrel carburetor, just tbi and mpi. A four barrel carburetor is good for an additional 25hp.also, check the c/r.

GT

Thanks for that link.  Interesting that Mercury rates them 100hp higher than GM did.  Makes me wonder if there are actually any differences or if they're tested differently.  Any thoughts on that?

The main point I was trying to make is that the truck engines can be woken up significantly with a H/C/I swap.  100+hp with inexpensive components is quite doable :)

52

The difference is easily explained.

A jet boat survives on a jet of water pushed out the back of a hull.
A prop boat is pushed by a propeller at a much lower and positive point. 

My last I/O boat had a small block in it and ran in excess of 65mph, with four people,  a dog and a cooler full of beer and soda. If you are looking to have that same performance in a jet, you will need to make well over 600hp and have the set up totally dialed in. Not to mention burn nearly three times the fuel.

One way you need to look at this that is somewhat eye opening.

On a hull such as yours, it would take a huge gain in horsepower to  make even a modest difference in performance.

To put it in perspective,  a peanut port headed 454 makes very close to 330hp in stock form.

Heads alone might be good for another 30hp. (Even that is a stretch) to make the heads work, you would need a cam change, bigger carburetor, different manifold, potentially larger fuel pump, different exhaust,   just to see the potential of the heads. This leaves the compression ratio stock (probably 8.8:1) with likely cast pistons and crank. You will barely notice a 100 hp gain (maybe another 5mph), which you still will not have with the above mentioned mods.

So in short, spend a bunch of money to break it. Woohoo...

I would leave her the way she is while scrounging parts and pieces to build a killer (if that is what you really want). This way you get to enjoy the boat while you build a different motor.

Good hunting.

GT

Being a n00b to the jet world I don't mean to step in and flaunt ignorance about the subject of jets vs I/Os or hull vs power, etc.  I am fairly experienced in automotive engines, though.  Here's what I do know...

Peanut ported (late 80s, early 90s) 454s were factory rated in trucks at around 230hp, 385tq with a 7.9:1 compression ratio.  HP rating is similar to later model 5.7 "Vortec" engines found in many I/O setups.  Adding a set of early closed chamber oval port heads, decent cam and intake will bump the compression up to about 9:1 and get you around 400hp.  Pretty decent gains and still a fairly mild engine.  I can't speak as to what kind of MPH gains you'll see in a jet... but in a car 170hp is a helluva kick in the seat :)

 

53
WTB / Re: 455 olds valley tray
« on: April 01, 2015, 06:37:11 PM »
Any advantage of that one vs. a stock one?

54
Engine Mechanical / Electrical / Re: Best starter for under 150$
« on: April 01, 2015, 06:33:51 PM »
2001 corvette starter 168 tooth flywheel. Google it. Autozone. Works great on mine. Lifetime warranty. Lightweight.

Interesting... hadn't heard an LSx style starter would work on an earlier SBC/BBC.  If that's the case I'd highly recommend getting an LQ9 starter (same KW rating as Corvette) because it has more reinforcement in the mounting area.  The passenger car starters only have a small flange on one side which can break if there's a kick-back or hydro-lock.  If that happens all the starter's torque is transferred to the 1 remaining bolt.  At best the bolt will bend, at worst it'll snap off and possibly take a chunk of bock with it.  Common problem on LS1s that can be avoided by using the truck starter. Google it ;)

55
Engine Mechanical / Electrical / Re: How to Build an Olds 455
« on: March 31, 2015, 06:59:07 PM »
For those needing copies, there are good quality scans out there on the 'net.  Google "Practical Olds", click one of the 1st few links and scroll down.  You'll find links to the article.

56
Suggestions / Support / Re: 79 schuster jet
« on: March 31, 2015, 01:38:56 PM »
Try not to run it too long without water running through it.  Not just for the engine but also for the packing glads that seal the suction side of the jet.  I have 2 shafts that are toast because some previous owner didn't follow this advice.

$5k would be a good price IF everything is in good shape... it can quickly escalate 2-3x that if they're not.  The only bummer about an auction is you can't test drive anything so it's tough to say what's what.  Keep that in mind when bidding. ;)

57
Suggestions / Support / Re: 79 schuster jet
« on: March 30, 2015, 05:29:44 PM »
Isn't that an Olds motor?

58
Hulls / Re: Help identifying this 79
« on: March 27, 2015, 02:06:48 PM »
HTB    HIGH TORQUE MARINE INC    11306 SIERRA HIGHWAY    AGUA DULCE    CA

In Business:    3/30/1995 0:00
Out of Business:    6/20/2007 0:00

OBTAINING BARE HULLS FROM (CHT). HTB WAS CUSTOM MARINE, W.K. CALDWELL, 214 W FOOTHILL BLVD, GLENDORA CA 91740, (213)331-3511, TYPE 13, IN BUS 721108 OOB 831121. MannyRamirez-EMAIL-010320-MFG PKG MAILED-010320. 011001 PH NO CHANGE, WAS (805) 268-8440.062007 ASSETS OF HIGH TORGUE ACQUIRED BY HTM2 (HTM)

http://www.uscgboating.org/content/manufacturers-identification.php

59
Hulls / Re: Identifying hull
« on: March 27, 2015, 02:02:35 PM »
The state probably issued that # as I seriously doubt that hull is home made.  2 scenarios I can think of...

1) The hull was made prior to 1972 when HINs became mandatory.  The state may have retro-issued a HIN for registration and tracking purposes.

2) It was stolen at some point, original HIN removed and it was re-registered as "Home Made".  Boat registrations aren't typically as well regulated as automotive and thieves know the loopholes.  Hope that's not the case here as that hull looks bitchin as hell.

60
The article most people follow (myself included) when building a 455 for marine use is The Practical Olds by Timm Jurincie that was published in the June 2006 edition of Hot Boat.  It details the steps he takes to build a reliable and moderately powerful Olds 455. 

The only link to the article that I know of is on another forum so I'm hesitant to post that link here (most forums don't like cross-linking).  Google "Practical Olds" and the 1st 2 results have links posted. ;)

61
Appreciate the concern, guys.  Tanks have been empty for years and will have been flushed several times before welding occurs.  Even then I'll probably fill them with water before attempting.  My good buddy is an ex-navy weldor and currently welds for the Coast Guard.  He'll be in charge of burning metal in this project :)

62
Thanks for the info!  I'm actually going to drill a drain hole in the lower corner then weld in an NPT bung once they're cleaned out.  Will be good to have a drain plug on there just in case.

63
Just picked up a set of older aluminum saddle tanks that have been sitting for a while.  There are "rocks" inside that crumble into powder when you squeeze them with your fingers.  Assuming that's corrosion?  Or something else? 

I can get them out easy enough but was wondering if there's any sort of chemical/acid that can thoroughly clean the inside to get rid of any remaining corrosion.  Any other recommendations?

I'd prefer to clean these up and use them as you wouldn't believe the cost of aluminum sheet here in Hawaii.  Making new tanks is not really in the budget.

Any help appreciated!

Chad

64
Projects / Re: '78 Tahiti Super Tiger Bubble Project
« on: March 02, 2015, 10:48:05 AM »
Went ahead and pulled the trigger on the '72 Tiger.  It's much further along than the '78.  I'll start a new thread on it as soon as I am home in the daylight to take pics of it.  Pretty stoked to have made "progress" without really doing anything... LOL!

65
Hulls / '72 Tahiti Tiger 18' vs '78 Tahiti Bubble Deck 19.5'... opinions?
« on: February 25, 2015, 12:57:07 PM »
Posted this in my project thread but that probably wasn't the best place to put it.  Looking for input on which of these hulls might be a better choice for what I'm trying to do.  Let me preface this by saying choices on hulls here in Hawaii is very limited which is why these are the 2 I'm comparing.  I already have the '78 but haven't gotten too far on it yet.

Use: Mainly a fun ski boat for the family.  Seating for 5 is a must.  Occasionally I'd like to open it up and try to hit a decent speed in excess of 60 MPH (without kids).  I'm building a mild Olds that I'm hoping will put down a touch over 400hp.

My main concern is hull design.  The bottoms are noticeably different.  I know neither is the greatest but does anyone know if either is considered "better" ?  I've read the Tahitis can have stability issues so that's a concern.  If one is known to be more stable I'd rather build that hull even if it costs a little more.  Reason I'm even contemplating the swap is that the '72 is MUCH farther along than the '78.

Couple of lousy pics for reference...  appreciate any input people have.




66
Projects / Re: 1970 Weiman
« on: February 23, 2015, 11:38:01 AM »
And finally, today I learned that the radio shack by my girlfriend's house is going out off business. And as such everything is 80-90 percent off

I ended up with all of these solderless connectors for a little less than 20.00



DAMN!!!!  You scored BIG TIME on those connectors.   :thumbup:

Motor is looking fantastic.  You'll be on the water in no time.

67
Projects / Re: '78 Tahiti Super Tiger Bubble Project
« on: February 23, 2015, 10:04:23 AM »
Got a call from the guy I bought the boat from.  Might possibly work a deal to trade my hull and a little cash for his '72 Tahiti Tiger (18' hull, non-bubble) project.  His is much further along... painted, 2 pumps, PD, seats, gauges, steering, etc.  No motor but set up for Olds.

http://honolulu.craigslist.org/oah/boa/4899414045.html

Anyone familiar with these boats have any recommendations?  The bottom hull design is noticeably different.  Anyone happen to know if either is "better"?

Thanks,
Chad

68
Hulls / Re: Rub Rail
« on: February 20, 2015, 05:46:09 PM »
Please keep us updated on your progress.  My project boat looks like it smacked the dock just hard enough to distort the rub rail in one small area.  I hope to get the boat painted next month and will be pulling/filling the rails.  I'd like to change out the stripping when it's done too.


69
Jet Pumps / Re: Wear ring non existant?
« on: February 20, 2015, 01:18:41 PM »
If the wear ring seized to the impeller there's a good chance it "self clearanced" and wallowed out the jet housing.  I'm a total newb to jets but see this type of situation on cars/engines all the time. 

If the ring is supposed to be a press fit (pretty sure it is?) a standard OD ring probably wont work anymore.  The hole may not even be perfectly round anymore.  Maybe someone with jet experience can chime in but it seems to me either the housing may be junk (toss it) or needs to be machined for an over-sized ring if such a thing exists.

I know that's a lot of ifs and maybes from a guy who hasn't done it.  Trying to offer food for thought and things to investigate before you buy new parts.

70
Engine Mechanical / Electrical / Re: Help.. need good news..
« on: February 20, 2015, 12:52:39 PM »
This is something we deal with all the time at work.  Many of these Mk IV BBCs are 40+ years old and the iron has fatigued.  We use TimeSerts to repair the threads and problem is solved.  Happens on all kinds of engines, not just BBCs.

71
Engines / Engine Parts For Sale / Re: Selling BBC Intake to Scoop
« on: February 19, 2015, 03:41:07 PM »
Got the carb today.  Thanks for the smooth transaction!

72
Projects / Re: 1970 Weiman
« on: February 19, 2015, 02:42:47 PM »
Looks great, Steve!  That light 6.0 is gonna knock at least 200 pounds off the back of the boat compared to an iron-headed big block.  450hp at the crank shouldn't be too tough to get with the right cam.  It'll fly!!

73
Project Boats For Sale / Re: 1969 Rogers 18'
« on: February 19, 2015, 01:27:19 PM »
Did the boat come with those flotation devices included?  LOL!

Good score, man.  You start a thread on this one?

74
Project Boats For Sale / Re: 1969 Rogers 18'
« on: February 19, 2015, 12:54:19 PM »
Whaaaat?  You don't want to ship this to Hawaii????  LOL!  JK :)  :screwy:

Good luck with the sale.  Looks like a cool project for someone to finish up.  Any plans for another project or complete boat?

75
Random Boat Parts For Sale / Re: C/L find: cheap seats $150 blue/white
« on: February 18, 2015, 05:57:50 PM »
So not fair... you guys have no idea how good you have it finding cheap boats / parts locally   :banghead:

 ;D

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5

Null

SMFPacks CMS 1.0.3 © 2026