Oh, I'm not blaming them. Exact opposite, I applaud them. Their hands are tied, I understand that. My point is that the gun grabbers always try and make the point that only law enforcement should have access to firearms when the ONLY time they are allowed to use them is when THEIR life is in peril, or they happen to be witness to someone else's life in peril. Even then, they have to second guess themselves becuase they will be put on administrative leave, and possibly face the Grand Jury over such an incident. They ( the gun grabbers) ignore the average citizen, who needs to have the right to defend themselves when their lives, or are also witness to someone else's life, being in peril. The same people who preach this and sponser bills and stuff, have armed body guards protecting them, so basically they're saying FOCK YOU!
I can make this point by bringing up the Rosie O'Donnell ordeal. She was talking up Gun control and crap all over her talk show any other chance she got. Even outside of that, being seen with politicians sponsoring such restrictive legislation. While at the same time, I kid you not, she was BUYING a gun, AND applying for a license to carry for her own body guard. So that fat dyke feels it's OK for her, but not for anyone else??? Gimme a break.
All the real problems started when 2 Kennedy's were shot. In spite of the fact there were multiple people around them with automatic weapons to protect them. That's a good reason to infringe the rights of 250 million people to defend themselves, NOT!. Then it gathered tremendous steam when someones husband (Sarah Brady), happened to be hit by a kook with a hard on for Jodie Foster. Making Jim Brady a little more of a retard than he was before. You didn't see Reagan whining, did you?? Nope, only the Brady's.
Now it gets to the Nth level. What's "Osama bin President"

gonna do. Already ammo is costing more than my car payment (Thank gawd I reload), and we have these sneaky actions that Tom was posting originally.
Ray