Its a double edge sword for me WHIZZZZZZZZ . I would just hate to see HotBan benefit from all that great info and great stories . It's kind of like " Your gonna have to crack a few eggs if you wanna make an omlet. "

-beerjet-

If the techie posts from the past don't come back to life, it's of no use.

X2 

Had to laugh when I got (and partially read) my new issue ,it says (Brian): "the magazine has almost bordered on SMUT ,almost to the point of following after several other flynt publication titles.....
 then in Barbies column she says : "we will not be running SMUT that you were seeing towards the end proir to the sale of hot boat ?? She did say they'd try thier best to get your typical "flat bottom boats" in...

Whats up next Burka Babes and sail boats ... I'm on the right but geeze louise 

heres a google search re the subject:  http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,942323,00.html
When they were leaked to the press two months ago, some of the more libertarian conclusions of the President's Commission on Obscenity and Pornography enraged those who fear that smut is polluting U.S. morals. Released officially and in full last week, the report of the panel's majority gave critics more to complain about than their wildest fantasies could have conjured up. Not only is pornography guiltless as a cause of crime, delinquency, deviance or emotional disturbance, said the majority, it can actually strengthen conjugal ties.

Of the group's 18 members, twelve viewed pornography positively. As evidence, they cited one study in which "substantial proportions" of people exposed to erotica believed that the effect on them had been "socially desirable." Participants in experiments that exposed married couples to films and literature traditionally reserved for stag parties claimed that the experience "lowered inhibitions" between husband and wife, increased "willingness to experiment" and heightened "satisfaction with marital sex life."