I was looking at overlap drawings of crankshafts and noticed the 4.5" crank I was wanting to run has a very small overlap and seems kind of weak looking to me. If someone could shed some light on what would be the best compromise between stroke length and crankshaft strength. I want as many c.I. like anyone else but I don't want a crank that I am afraid of breaking when I put nitrous on the motor. I plan on making around 700hp n/a then some nitrous once everything is sorted out.
Technically speaking, the less rod/main journal overlap the less stuctural integrity of the crankshaft, yes. But this does not mean in-and-of-itself that a crankshaft "isn't strong"
per se....regardless of manufacturer and/or brand application. But...one may indeed deduce that a crankshaft with
less journal overlap is likely not as strong as an equivalent crankshaft with
more journal overlap. That much is obvious.
Most offshore cast stroker cranks for the BBF that are 4.500 stroke are "rated" to 700+ hp. That being said, I have seen more broken crankshafts, more windowed cylinders, more burnt valves, more blown head gaskets, etc, from nitrous oxide than any other form of power adder. Therefore, if you want to have 700 hp
+ nitrous oxide then I would insist on a
forged crankshaft,....I don't care how much or how little journal overlap there is.
LO